Stormont Knowledge Exchange Seminar Series

1 Mar

QUB School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work

and the

Northern Ireland Assembly Research and Information Service

22 March – 5 July 2012

Venue: Room 115, Parliament Buildings, Stormont Estate

Time: 1.30 – 3.30pm

Promoting evidence-led policy and law-making within Northern Ireland’ – that is the  underlying aim of the upcoming ‘Knowledge Exchange Seminar Series’.  In an attempt to encourage debate and improve understanding, the Series will provide an opportunity for the presentation of local research findings about diverse social issues faced in various sectors, such as health, social development, education, children/young people and older people.

Seminars will be free and will run on Thursdays from 22 March through 5 July 2012.  Each seminar will take place from 1.30-3.30pm in Room 115, Parliament Building, located on Stormont Estate, where parking is easily accessible.  Refreshments will be served. The Series will also provide excellent networking opportunities.  We aim to have a spectrum of attendees, including MLAs and their staff, Assembly staff, public and private sector employees, and academia, together with voluntary and community groups.

Please reserve your place by emailing

Seminar attendees will also have the opportunity to tour Parliament Buildings at the conclusion of each seminar.  Kindly indicate your interest when emailing.

22 MarchSally Shortall: What counts as ‘evidence’? The complexities of providing evidence to inform public policy Evidence-based policy implicitly assumes a linear relationship between research evidence and policy formation. The reality is much more complex. There are power struggles between different groups presenting different interpretations of the world, political ideology is a key driver of policy making, resources are finite, and policies must be palatable with the electorate. This paper will explore the complexities of evidence based policy.

26 AprilMike Tomlinson: Defining the breadline. Is there a Northern Ireland consensus? Measures of poverty typically combine low income with indicators of deprivation – items and activities that people lack because they cannot afford them.  Which deprivation indicators are the important ones for defining poverty is a matter of debate. The seminar will present findings from a population-wide survey of Northern Ireland asking people’s opinion about items and activities that everyone should be able to afford and not have to do without.  A total of 76 items and activities were tested and the seminar will explore the degree of consensus within the population on ‘the necessities of life’.

3 MayMadeleine Leonard: young people’ attitudes to peace walls in Belfast The purpose of this presentation is to present young people’s attitudes to peace-walls in Belfast and whether they feel peace-walls should be temporary or permanent structures.  The presentation will underline how important it is for policy-makers to consult with young people on their attitudes to these walls as a prelude to finding ways to challenge taken for granted assumptions about the legacy of conflict in Northern Ireland.

10 May – Lynn Johnston:  The life-course, age and intergenerational relations Our planet’s changing age demographic has sparked economic debates relating to intergenerational equity and exchanges. This seminar focusses on the social aspects of intergenerational relationships and will present findings from a neighbourhood case study. At the local level, issues which impact on intergenerational relationships are presented around three themes: social exclusion, age discrimination and the legacy of the conflict.

17 MayGavin Davidson: Supported and Substitute Decision Making under Mental Capacity Legislation: a review of the international evidence The Mental Capacity (Health, Welfare and Finance) Bill for Northern Ireland is currently being drafted. The proposed law is a potentially progressive approach to providing a comprehensive legal framework for substitute decision making for people whose decision making is impaired. An important aspect of the law, policy and practice in this area is ensuring that, before substitute decision making is used, all practicable steps are taken to support the person to make their own decision/s. This seminar will review the international evidence on supported and substitute decision making frameworks.

31 MayKaren Winter: Addressing the educational underachievement of children in care It is well known that across the U.K and elsewhere children in care have poor educational poor outcomes in comparison with the child population as a whole. The figures for Northern Ireland indicate that children in care here have the lowest attainment scores in Maths and English. This seminar will present the findings of a study that sought to ascertain the effectiveness of a scheme-the Letterbox Club-in raising attainment levels for primary school children in foster care ages 7-11 years.

7 JuneNicola Carr and Karen Winter: Improving court work skills in child care proceedings. The benefits of an inter-disciplinary approach are evident when working with individuals and families with a range of complex needs, and who have contact with multiple services. This is particularly apposite in the area of child protection and welfare. This seminar will present an overview of an innovative inter-professional training initiative, which focuses on developing court work skills for practice in child care proceedings. The importance of comprehensive evidence-based assessment and competency within the judicial setting is highlighted.

14 JuneKaren McElrath and Julie Harris: Institutional stigma and the delivery of methadone maintenance: A comparison of clients’ experiences from North/South Ireland  Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is widely recognised as an intervention that is used to treat opioid (namely heroin) dependence. It is highly regulated and is available in both North/South Ireland.  Using data collected in four different studies in North/South Ireland, we describe clients’ experiences with MMT.  Methadone provision in both jurisdictions was characterized by social control and institutional stigma, that served to reinforce “addict” identities, expose “undeserving” patients to the public gaze, and create barriers to reintegration. We discuss these findings in terms of the challenges for policymakers and service providers.

21 JuneJanet Carter- Anand: Older people’s perceptions of elder abuse: Implications for policy and professional practice The development of elder abuse services has traditionally been defined from the perspective of policy makers and professionals. This presentation will outline the findings from the first all-Ireland study that consulted older people as to their views on what interventions and services support people experiencing abuse. The subsequent report found that older people perceived elder abuse more in terms of “personhood abuse”. The policy implication of these findings for service development is that enhanced attention and resources should be directed to community development activities that empower older people to share their concerns informally thereby gaining confidence to seek more formal interventions when necessary.

28 June – Ann-Marie Doherty: Health in All Policies. It is well know that health expenditure is costly. The introduction of a “whole of government approach to health” is gaining increasing momentum around the world.  We know little about how policy to improve the health of the population gets made and the evidence and influence that has a bearing on this.  This seminar focuses on Health in All Policies as an emerging paradigm across Government. It will present findings from a PhD study, where a range of ‘elite’ interviews were carried out with Departmental Officials, Members of the Legislative Assembly and Advisors.

5 July – Joanne Wilson:  Understandings of well-being: Implications for public policy This seminar explores the Government’s current desire to measure the nation’s well-being. Well-being is a complex and nebulous concept and different people will use different words to describe it. While this lack of clarity has not hampered our ability to measure the construct, it does pose significant implications for its use as a public health goal. Based on a conceptual map, we discuss how two different discourses (i.e. the individual and the collective) can shape the types of policies developed, the targets set, and the choice of indicators used and the types of interventions applied to advance well-being.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: